Appendix 14 - Noah's Ark found on Mount Ararat and... the Mystery of the Rapture

 

Genesis 6-5 Yahweh saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. 6 Yahweh was sorry that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him in his heart. 7 Yahweh said, "I will destroy man whom I have created from the surface of the ground; man, along with animals, creeping things, and birds of the sky; for I am sorry that I have made them."

Genesis 6-8 But Noah found favor in Yahweh's eyes. 9 This is the history of the generations of Noah. Noah was a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time. Noah walked with God. 10 Noah became the father of three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

11 The earth was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence. 12 God saw the earth, and saw that it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth. 13 God said to Noah, "The end of all flesh has come before me, for the earth is filled with violence through them. Behold, I will destroy them with the earth. 

Genesis 6-14 Make a ship of gopher wood. You shall make rooms in the ship, and shall seal it inside and outside with pitch. 15 This is how you shall make it. The length of the ship will be three hundred cubits, its breadth fifty cubits, and its height thirty cubits. 16 You shall make a roof in the ship, and you shall finish it to a cubit upward. You shall set the door of the ship in its side. You shall make it with lower, second, and third levels(=> possible door on the back side, but not up or down side.)

17 I, even I, do bring the flood of waters on this earth, to destroy all flesh having the breath of life from under the sky. Everything that is in the earth will die. 18 But I will establish my covenant with you. You shall come into the ship, you, your sons, your wife, and your sons' wives with you.

 

Matthew 24-37 Jesus prophesies: "As the days of Noah were, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.38 For as in those days which were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark39 and they didn't know until the flood came, and took them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.

 

 

This is how Noah was able to build the ark in 100 years.

 

  Following the archaeological findings of the true Noah's Ark,

on Mount Ararat, in the 20th century and detailed below in Chapters 2 to 4).

 

 

1- Noah's Ark Construction inspired by God

 

a) Who was Noah ?

What does the Bible tell us about Noah?

Genesis 6-8 Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord. 9 Noah was a just and honest man in his time; Noah walked with God.

 

Noah was a very courageous man, peaceful, lonely, away from the restless world, he married only belatedly. He only had 3 Sons when he was 500 years old. And certainly three sons in one times: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. He is therefore very productive by nature. Genesis 5-32 Noah, five hundred years old, begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

Ingenious, he was lonely because passionate about the work of wood, leather, agriculture, pottery, astronomy and especially impressed by the things of God learned from his father and grandfather ...

He had not known his great-grandfather Enoch disappeared too soon (he had been raptured by God), but had heard the story of his visions told by his grandfather Methuselah who bore a very particular name: Metuschelah "At his death, the Javelin of God ". His ancestor Henoch spoke with God ... He too was not alone, he spoke with God.

Yes Noah was fascinated by the story of his ancestor Enoch, and he scanned the sky especially during a meteorite apparition (See Annex 7).

One day he certainly saw a providential meteorite fallen near his home and upset by the noise produced by the celestial object, he began to search for it. When he discovered it, he realized that it was made of a material still unknown to him. His very metallic composition intrigued him and he decided to try to work on this new material. And he was passionate about the work of this very hard metal. It took a lot of time, but he had and was persevering. And so he started forging the steel, burning it, because he had noticed that it had melted on the surface.

He then made an anvil to work with various hammers and all sorts of various tools very useful for his daily life and his various activities. He was able to obtain his first nails and metal piles. He made nails of different lengths: 0,07m - 0,1m - 0,15m - 0,3m - 0,5m - 1m - 2m ...

 

This is how Noah occupied his first 500 years, far from the world and his lusts. He liked to keep his secrets and did not reveal anything. He remained so quiet without being unnecessarily disturbed by his too eager contemporaries who would have quickly stolen his discoveries.

One day he wanted to go further and had the idea of ​​a saw to cut the trees. He had to imagine how to get a metal sheet like a leather sheet. He tried to sink the steel, hammer, polish and sharpen this new blade equipped with several small teeth. His first saw was born which helped him to obtain wood more easily. And then he made a big master saw going everywhere capable of cutting big trees. He had to run the molten steel on a long board, covered with clay and sandy soil, which would pass very regularly before the container of molten metal ...

Is it worth mentioning that Noah was endowed with an uncommon brain capacity, having not yet fully undergone the degeneration due to sin that would increase over time, more and more, over the following generations and irremediably diminish their faculties? (See Annex 7i)

 

How tall was Noah?

If he lived 950 years, he could have grown up to around 214 years old (Currently: 80 years old max - growth around 18 years old),

  • Or for 11 times longer, which would result in a size of around 20 m

But he built an arch 15 m high with 3 floors, about 5 m high per floor.

  • If a current man of 1.8m lives in a house with floors of 2.5m on average,
  • This suggests a size for Noah of 3.5 to 3.6 m high, twice the average current size.
  • The degeneration of future generations makes it possible to envisage such a size for Noah.

 Example of an individual with a probable height of 3.50m; a race of men between 3 and 4.6 m tall.

See: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9ant_de_Castelnau

Moses wrote Genesis 1000 years later, recording the dimensions of the ark in Egyptian cubits.

  • 300 x 50 x 30 cubits = 150 x 25 x 15 m = 150 x 25 x 15 cubits of Noah, if he measured approximately 3.6 m.
  • I measure 1.89m and my cubit is exactly 0.5m (from the elbow to the end of the middle finger).
  • So, we think highly likely that Noah was very tall and about 9 feet tall, 3.6m.
  • He had to command respect for the animals of the time that God led to his ark.
  • 4 men of his size (Noah and his sons) certainly had to woodcut like 12 current men.

 

 

b) Sawing big trees with saw going everywhere (it is possible)

 

 

  

c) God then told him about his project:

Genesis 6-13 Then God said to Noah, The end of all flesh is stopped by me; because they filled the earth with violence; Behold, I will destroy them with the earth. 14 Make yourself an ark of gopher wood; you will dispose this ark in cells, and you will coat it with pitch inside and outside. 15 This is how you will do it: the ark will be 300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits high. 16 And thou shalt make a window to the ark, and cut it to 1 cubit above; you will make a door on the side of the ark; and you will build a lower, a second, and a third floor. 17 And I will bring the flood of waters on the earth to destroy all flesh that breathes life under heaven; all that is on the earth will perish. 18 But I make my covenant with you; you will enter the ark, you and your sons, your wife and your sons' wives with you. 19 Of all living things and all flesh, you shall bring two of every kind into the ark, to keep them alive with you: there shall be one male and one female. 20 Birds after their kind, and cattle after his kind, and all the creeping things of the earth after their kind, two of every kind shall come to you, that you may preserve them. 21 And you take of all the food that you eat, and make provision for it with you, that they may feed you and them. 22 This Noah did, and did all that God commanded him.

And Noah resolved to build this means of salvation for him and his family and all the animals that God would send him: His ARK, the ARK of GOD, his friend so merciful to him. He wanted all animals to enter the ark, so Noah took the dimensions given by God for the internal dimensions of the Ark.

 

d) Here are some of the problems Noah faced with building and living in the ark and how he was able to overcome them.

  • You had to be an expert in hard metal work.
    • We saw how in his first 500 years he had become an expert.

•  Cutting and transporting tall trees:

    • Choice of construction area in the forest, below the slaughter area and close to a river. (see sketch below)
    • Choice of a flat construction area, but which had to be excavated in a "V" shape to keep large trees in position on rollers.
      • This also reduces the height of construction by the same amount
      • It was also necessary to drain in the excavations to avoid moisture problems
    • The first 5 or 10 large trees should be on site, nearby and cut in order to be positioned effortlessly. Under their own weight they had to fall, already limbed and roll lower in their excavated site in advance. The order of slaughter was precise. (See below)
    • Noah looked for this ideal location (after drawing it maybe) and he found it. He knew it was there when he saw the positioning of the trees in the forest, because everything was going to be simplified.
    • Moving heavy loads with a team of 12 oxen, draft horses, camels or elephants ... who were very happy to help Noah in his great construction, this calm and peaceful man, the animal friend.

•  Sealing the ark with hemp rope and bitumen

    • found near the plain, whose refined oil already provided precious light in the evening. The arch had to be perfectly sealed.
    • The arch coated with bitumen for its waterproofness was nonetheless airtight.
  • Ventilation of the arch:
    • It was necessary to renew the air inside the arch, make ventilation holes to get fresh air, but not water. Because the animals would need to breathe.
    • Given the production of carbon dioxide, carbon oxide and methane by the animals and the various oil lamps in the arch, it was imperative to have good ventilation of the entire arch.
    • A supply of fresh air at all points and a good evacuation of toxic gases was necessary. The difference in density of all these gases is small and a simple stream of air is enough to mix them all in the atmosphere and therefore also in the ark.
    • 1 sheep produces 8 kg of methane per year. 200,000 sheep produce 200,000 x 8 kg of methane per year = 1,600,000 kg, or 1,600 tonnes of methane.
    • Fresh air goes down naturally and warm air rises.
    • Leather ventilation ducts had to raise the stale air from the bottom of the arch to the top of the roof.
    • The roof had to have a double ridge in places to allow this ventilation so precious.
    • Ventilation ducts of fresh leather air on the sides of the arch went down to the 1st level.
  • 1 single window of 0.25m²:
    • Noah knew how to work glass too. He had noticed that a sandy base under his fire was becoming glassy and transparent.
  • The total life span in the ark was: 1 year and 17 days = 377 or 382 days

Genesis 7-7 And Noah went into the ark with his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives, to escape the waters of the flood ... 10 Seven days later the waters of the flood were on the earth. 11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, in that day all the fountains of the great deep were gushed out, and the windows of heaven were opened. 12 The rain fell on the earth forty days and forty nights. 13 And on the same day came into the ark Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, the wife of Noah, and the three wives of his sons with them: 14 And all the animals after their kind, all the cattle according to their kind, his kind, all the creeping things that crawl on the earth according to their kind, all the birds after their kind, all the little birds, all that has wings ... Then Jehovah shut the door on him.

Genesis 8-14 In the second month, the twenty-seventh day of the month, the earth was dry. 15 Then God spoke to Noah, saying, 16 Come out of the ark, you and your wife, your sons, and your sons' wives with you. 17 Bring out with you all the animals of all flesh that are with you.

  • Water reserves:
    • The Ark could not carry all the water needed for the survival of so many animals. If a single sheep needs about 1 L / day when it does not sleep in hibernation (It can be estimated 15 days of awakening necessary to restore over 12 months), and if the arch could carry the equivalent of 200 000 sheep, it would have taken during 15 days at least 3 000 000 Liters of water or 3 000 m3 of Water. That is, a tank of 150 x 20 x 1 m, which would have weighted the arch of 3,000 tons and pushed the arch of 1 m more into the water, reducing its buoyancy and vital space by 5%.
    • God said to Noah, I will rain 40 days and 40 nights on the earth. Noah therefore assumed that after this first devastating rain, God would still rain on the ark for his needs. He lived by faith in his God who provided for all his needs and who would take care of all the inhabitants of the ark.
    • Noah made water tanks that he connected to a rainwater recovery system when the sea was not rough. An anti-fall railing encircled the arch, allowing Noah to safely travel over the roof of the arch to open and close the water tank caps.
  • Food reserves:
    • Noah filled the attics of the ark with fodder, grain, vegetables and fruit, which was the food of all before the disobedience of man.

Genesis 1-29 And God said, Behold, I give to you every herb bearing seed, and it is on the face of all the earth, and every tree having in it the fruit of the tree, and bearing seed, it shall be your food. 30 And to every animal of the earth, to every bird of the sky, and to all that moves on the earth, having in it a breath of life, I give every green grass for food. And that was so.

Genesis 6-21 And you, take of all the food that you eat, and make a provision for it with you, that they may feed you and them.

    1. God has passed all his creation subject to man, through a kind of death in the ark, then a resurrection.
    2. God has imposed his food on everyone in the ark. The fear of God filled all these animals.

 

 

e) The different phases of construction of Noah's Ark base.

The Bible does not mention special and extraordinary entities that helped Noah in his great construction site.

And if it was simply divine providence that had grown trees on an ideal area and localization to simplify construction.

Let's imagine that Noah discovers such a site:

 

 

 

f) Here are the Ark drawings:

 

 

 

 

                                                       

 g)

  

            Estimated times for a normal man of size: 1.8m, and a woman of 1.68m

            But Noah could measure: 3.6 m (having lived 950 years he could grow for about 200 years - see 1a)

 

 

2- UNDERSTANDING THE REMAINS OF NOAH’S ARK

 

 

 (First published in newsletter # 9 in 1994) - https://wyattmuseum.com/understanding-the-remains-of-noahs-ark/2011-693

 

The entire key to understanding the evidence which confirms that this site DOES in fact contain the remains of Noah’s Ark, is understanding the condition of the remains. The “world” has a preconceived notion of what they will accept, and that is:

A recognizable wooden ship, (still intact after 4,300 years), and the ship MUST be on the volcanic mountain known as Mt. Ararat.

The concept of the ark’s appearance has been further enhanced by those who interpreted the fact that the ark had rooms to mean that it had to look like a barge-shaped houseboat instead of a ship. This concept has been based on the many claimed sightings of the ark on Mt. Ararat- and not a single sighting is accompanied by any evidence.

a) The Ark - NOT Barge-Shaped

First of all, a barge-shaped vessel could not survive on the open seas. Any sailor can tell you that. In fact, the idea is preposterous. The oil tankers of today, which traverse the open seas, have a hull which is NOT flat on the bottom, but instead is rounded. The wave action of the stormy seas today cannot compare with the turmoil of the open seas of the flood, which extended the entire surface of the earth- if a barge-shaped ship today cannot sail the ocean, erase the idea of a barge-shaped ark from your mind. This simply IS NOT a possibility. If you want to research the subject yourself, go to the library and look up “ships and ship-building” and/or “fluid dynamics” or “hydrodynamics”.

The “boat-shaped object” is not barge-shaped- it displays the shape of a sea-going vessel. Therefore, from the beginning of its discovery in the stereo-photo, it had this one feature already in its favor.

b) The Ark Would Not have Survived on Mt. Ararat

If the ark was a reality, then so was the flood (which destroyed the entire face of the earth), and this means that the ark, IF it survived until today, is the oldest structure on earth. Considering the fragile state of wooden homes that were built even in the last century, could we expect to find an intact ark, or even any remains at all? Certainly not in the ever-moving glaciers on Mt. Ararat, which continually flow and grind everything in their path into minute pieces.

Even if an object survived in the glaciers, could it survive the incredible blasts of the past eruptions, the most recent of which blew out an entire section of the mountain? Again, go to the library and research “volcanoes” and “glaciers”. Read up on Mount St. Helens, whose last eruption was similar to the last eruption which Mt. Ararat experienced, even leaving a similar blown-out hole in the mountain. You will see the total devastation suffered by everything on or around the mountain at that time.

In addition to this, the Turkish military has been training their commandos on Mt. Ararat for many years, and they know every inch of the mountain. They KNOW there is nothing up there.

The site that Ron Wyatt (see Chap 3 below) proclaimed to be the remains of Noah's ark is not on Mount Ararat. It's on the mountain next to Ararat.

Traditional teaching says that Noah's Ark landed on Mount Ararat; but the Bible does not say it at all. It is said that Noah's ark landed on the mountains of Ararat; Mountains in the plural. In the Hebrew text, it is literally written the mountains of Urartu: all this mountainous region of eastern Turkey. The remains of the Ark were found in the mountains of Ararat about 20 miles (32 km) from the summit of Mount Ararat.

c) How was the Ark Preserved?

The evidence found at the “boat-shaped object”, which we will, in complete confidence, refer to as “the ark”, shows that the ark was only preserved at all because it was covered in lava flow which effectively sealed it in a sort of “time capsule”. However, the mountain it is on is NOT volcanic- the evidence shows that the lava resulted from an eruption of a volcano many miles to the south in present-day Iran.

The lava from that mountain was ejected into the air and carried to the top of the ridge above the ark’s present location. The existence of this volcano is proven by the broken stele Ron Wyatt found in 1984 (see below in 3) upon this ridge which showed the unique limestone ridge with a volcano positioned next to it to the south. Today, this volcano is collapsed and cannot be seen except from the top of the ridge, not from the viewpoint of the artist who inscribed the stele.

d) The Ark Covered in Lava

The lava reached the top of the ridge and began to travel down the side of the mountain, covering the ark. The path of the lava can be distinctly seen in the present mud-flow area. One way mud flows are formed is when water is trapped over a long period of time in the slowly decaying lava. Then, when the lava finally deteriorates into soil, the tremendous amount of water captured and retained in it, begins to flow, sometimes quite rapidly and catastrophicly, which is called a mud-slide.

The weight of this tremendous amount of molten rock (lava) flowing upon the ark caused the 2 top decks to collapse. If that is so, why wasn’t the ark burned up? There are 2 possibilities as to why it wasn’t burned up- the first is this: assuming the lava was the type which would have caused a wooden object to catch on fire, if the ark was completely covered by lava rapidly, this would cut off the oxygen supply and combustion would not be possible.

But, supposing it was covered more slowly,- it is a documented fact that lava does not always cause combustion. I will use a quote from a “good ole evolutionary science book:

“It might be supposed that the high temperatures of the lava would give off an enormous amount of heat, This is not so, however, and it is quite usual for a flow to pass through a forest or town without causing a fire. One flow from Paricutin even piled up against oaks and cotton-woods without destroying them…. How can we explain this anomaly of high lava temperature and absence of fire and flames? To begin with, lava consists of a vitreous mass which is a poor conductor of heat. It also cools quickly at the surface, becoming covered with a crust which in some measure prevents further heat radiation from inside the mass. This a lava flow has, as it were, a constantly forming insulating case around its molten interior, so that the fron of the flow is preceded by a protecting crust.” (The New Larousse Encyclopedia of the Earth, pub. by Hamlin Publishing Group Limited, copyrighted 1961, revised edition 1972, page 158.)

Either way you choose, the fact that the ark was covered by lava DOES NOT in any way mean that it had to be burned up. The fact that the decks seem to be uniformly collapsed indicates that it was covered rapidly, which would have cut off the oxygen supply. We do have specimens which display some burning, but it seems to be very limited in extent.

e) The Ark Revealed when Lava Deteriorated

The lava covered the ark and sealed it in an air-tight “capsule”. So why is it now visible- why isn’t it still encased in the lava? Because lava deteriorates and breaks down over time into fertile soil. Let’s again go to the same book we referred to above:

“The soils which develop from the decomposition of the lavas, cinders and ashes are exceptionally rich in potash, lime and phosphates….. Many districts of the world with a high agricultural population owe the richness of their land to volcanic material.” (ibid., page. 173.)

Hawaii is an excellent example of this - their wonderful soil which produces the beautiful exotic flowers we associate with this paradise, are a result of the decayed lava, so rich in the nutrients necessary for perfect growth. But it takes lava a very long time to deteriorate- how long depends on the type, etc., and we cannot know exactly how long the ark was covered. However, over time, as the lava began its deterioration process, it was no longer air-tight.

f) The Remains Were Fossilized

The ark is situated on a mountain side and it slopes. The front end is at about a 6,350 foot elevation while the lower end is at about the 6,250 foot elevation. The lava deteriorated over time, and being no longer air-tight, it was no longer water-tight. The region experiences several months of snow with the accompanying cold temperatures. In the spring, the snow slowly melts and as it does, the water flows down the mountainside. This means that as the lava began to deteriorate, this water began to flow through the material which covered the ark.

As the water slowly seeped over the preserved structures of the ark, it began to wash away minute particles of the wood and metal fittings of the structure. This took place on a molecular level- molecule by molecule was washed away. But as each molecule broke loose and washed away with the water, it left a “hole” the exact size of the molecule that had broken loose.

As the water flowed over the structure, some of the molecules it picked up from materials it had passed over prior to arriving at the ark, lodged in the “molecule holes” left in the structure.. The process I am describing is called “petrification”, or “mineral replacement”. For an object to become petrified, 2 things are ALWAYS required :

       First, that the object be buried rapidly, and

       Second, that it have water flowing through it.

If it is not airtight and has no water flowing over it, it suffers from decay and is not preserved. The evolutionists will be quick to tell you that petrification takes millions of years to occur, but this is simply not the truth. If petrification does not occur at least a rapidly as the decay rate, the object simply decays away.

g) Petrified- Literally “Turned to Stone”

As the water flowed down the mountain into the soil and then reached the ark, the structure members nearest the top were petrified with molecules of the substances in the earth ABOVE the ark, which were minerals.

As the water flowed over the midsection of the ark, it had picked up molecules from the ark structures it had flowed over prior to reaching the midsection. Therefore, it began to be petrified with substances from its own structure in addition to the substances in the soil above it. At least that is what SHOULD have occurred if the object really is the ark.

The evidence at the site shows that this IS exactly what happened. The deck timber which Ron obtained from the approximate mid-section of the ship contained over 13% iron. Iron which came from the metal fittings of the structure above mid-section.

The majority of molecules involved in the petrification process are molecules from the natural substances in the earth and the lava. The first analyses Ron had performed on his specimens from the site showed an approximate 51% silica content. That’s fine- The “Encyclopaedia Brittanica”, 1985 ed., vol. 19, page 506, (under “volcanoes”) states:

” Magma consists of a molten-silicate mass within the earth, of various composition…”

In fact, all petrified objects contain a great deal of silica simply due to its abundance in the soil.

h) The Sure-Fire Test

But there is one substance that is NOT found in natural minerals, which we will now discuss. As I began to study the subject of “carbon”, which involves the study of chemistry, which is a little involved for me, I learned some very interesting facts. Compounds of carbon can be analyzed to determine whether they are composed of matter that was non-organic, or organic, which means it can be determined whether they were once living-matter or not. It’s that simple. Therefore, the one test to determine if an object was organic (once living), or not is to determine its carbon content- whether it contains organic carbon or not.

When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so he took it to Galbraith Labs to be analyzed. Chiselling a sample from the specimen (on camera), they analyzed it and found that it did contain inorganic carbon (.0081%). However, it also contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON, which is over 100 times more than the amount of inorganic carbon!

Every petrified object ever found that was once living,- tree branch, bone, sea shell, etc.,- will show organic carbon in its analysis. So, the deck timber specimen WAS once composed of living matter! Since it didn’t look like a bone or a shell, we feel pretty confident in stating that it is petrified wood.

OK, we have decaying lava which is revealing the presence of petrified objects that look like wood and contain large amounts of iron and other metals. Remember we discussed how the substances found in the petrified object got there by being washed in from flowing water which had first past over other substances? So where did the iron come from? In order for there to be such a high percentage of iron in the petrified wood, the water which effected its petrification had to pass over a large amount of iron prior to reaching the petrifying object. The soil above the ark does not contain that much iron. One control specimen taken from the area OUTSIDE the ark, but within 50 or so yards, revealed a .54% iron and .77% ferric oxide content. If we are to believe that the petrified wood received its iron content from the naturally-occurring iron in the region above the ship, we would have to believe that the entire iron content of the region was gathered up by the waters and deposited ONLY in the petrified wood. In other words, it’s impossible.

The large amounts of metals in the petrified wood could only come from one place- from the water passing over a LARGE amount of metal in the ark’s structure- metal which we now know composes the thousands of fittings which held the timbers together.

i) The Ark Hidden for Many, Many Years

And so the ark remained hidden for many, many years- its presence unknown since its being covered by the lava flow, which incidentally carried it down the mountain until it was impaled on a massive outcropping of bedrock. But we’ll get to that later.

In the late 1950’s, the high-altitude photo taken during the NATO survey showed this incredible outline of a ship high on a mountainside in a mudflow. The first expedition to the site in 1960 didn’t see anything they could recognize as being a man-made object because all that was visible was the decayed lava which was now a layer of rich, fertile soil. Oh, here and there a “rock protruded through the earth which was actually petrified wood, but its weathered condition camouflaged its true identify. The early expedition didn’t understand what to expect- they were looking for an intact boat.

j) “Truth Shall Spring out of the Earth”- the 1978 Earthquake

Then, in late 1978, an earthquake cause the soil surrounding the mysterious “shape” to fall away from the sides, giving the effect that the “capsule” had literally popped up from the earth. With the soil removed from the sides, the object took on even more of the recognizable shape of a ship.

The sides displayed indentions at evenly spaced intervals, which were actually the empty spaces where rib timbers once were. But why are they empty- what happened to the rib timbers if they were petrified? The answer is: “due to the effect of weathering”.

k) Identification by What is NOT Present

Let’s again return to our favorite science book, “The Larousee Encyclopedia” from which we quoted above:

“Whenever rocks are exposed to attack by weathering process, loose material forms, sometimes in large quantities…. Mass wasting is almost inseparable from weathering and the many other agents of gradation. Water, for example, aids its work considerably…. In mountain areas daily freeze-and-thaw action, or frost wedging, plays its part. Fissures in the rocks fill with water which freezes and expands at night. Under the pressure of the innumerable wedges of ice, the rock cracks. Next morning, the ice melts in the sun and no longer supports the rock fragments, many of which roll down the slope to join other rocks and debris at the foot.”. (page 41.)

Keep in mind that the structures of the ark were petrified and now turned to stone. When the soil around the sides of the ark was still in place, the ribs were preserved. We know this even though they are now gone. The way we know is simple- the empty indentations, evenly spaced, are all the evidence we need. Like a footprint in the mud, they wouldn’t be there if a foot hadn’t been there earlier.

The weather extremes of the region had accomplished this process of “frost wedging” which fractured the rib timbers which were now turned to stone. They remained in place as long as the surrounding soil held them. But when it fell away, the fractured “turned to stone” timbers fell into pieces and specimens of the petrified wood lie all around the site.

l) Color Difference of the Petrified Ribs

The INTERNAL structure members are in a much better state simply because they have not been exposed to the elements. On the east side of the ark is a section in which the rib timbers are exposed but have NOT completely fallen away and left holes where they once were. However, these ARE fractured, having suffered from “frost wedging”. It was on this section that Ron and Richard performed the “mini-excavation” in which the ribs were able to be seen due to the color difference, even though the ribs are in a fragmented state. They are still held in place by the soil, probably due to their angle and also some Divine assistance.

m) What Caused the Color Difference

This section is at the front of the ship on the uphill section. The substances in the water which was flowing over the ship’s structures and which effected its petrification were minerals from the soil up the mountain from the ship. These minerals consisted of silica from the soil, lime and calcium, to name a few. This gave the petrified structure a “whitish” appearance, compared to the petrified remains of the lower section of the ship, which featured a darker color due to the large amount of metals in them.

We have 2 specimens of petrified wood, both about 6 inches long, both 2 inches wide and 1 1/2 inches deep. They are identical except for one thing- the piece which came from inside the crack near the front of the ship is very light colored, while the other piece is dark. They are both petrified wood pieces from the ship, only one piece’s molecules were replaced by lighter colored substances than the other.

n) Other Exposed Structure Members

The timbers which extend out through the ground surface, such as the deck support beams and the deck joists, today look like ordinary rocks. Why? Because they ARE rocks- petrification, or mineral replacement, turns objects into rocks. And these petrified timbers have been exposed to the elements and have suffered extreme weathering.

However, the deck joists, being located high on the sides of the ribs, are located in a position where the surface water flows past them. This limits the “frost wedging” to a degree, which other structure located in a lower section where the surface water tends to collect, suffers. What this means in simple language is that the petrified structure members which are near the surface are more vulnerable to fracturing into small pieces if they lie in an area where surface water stands.

In the winters, the water, which has seeped into its tiny cracks and crevasses, subjects the petrified structure to continual expansion due to the water freezing, fracturing it into pieces. Once the soil surrounding and supporting this structure is removed, the fragments collapse into a heap. Voila - no more visibly identifiable petrified structure - only a heap of what looks like rocks. But lab analysis still reveals what these “rocks” once were by the presence of the organic carbon which is NOT present in objects (natural rocks) which were not once living matter.

o) Another Similar Boat Excavated

In 1939, a very unique excavation took place of an ancient burial boat known today as the “Sutton Hoo” boat. When carefully excavated, they discovered that, “yes”, there had once been an ancient burial boat there- however, the wooden structure had long ago decayed. What was STILL present were the decomposed and siliconized iron fittings which held the timbers together. As they removed the soil from the area, they discovered that the decayed wood had left a color difference in the soil which distinctly showed the structure of the ship in the earth. The iron fittings, still in place, combined with this coloration in the soil, allowed the excavators to preserve the perfect imprint of the ship. On a very small scale, this is similar to the condition of the ark except for the fact that the ark does still contain a large amount of internal petrified structures.

p) The Internal Structure Revealed

But how do we know about the internal structure? The radar scans. The sub-surface interface radar revealed a pattern of internal structure which the makers of the radar determined to be “not of natural origin”. The radar doesn’t tell us precisely what the internal structure is made of, although limited distinction is possible because of different densities. However, it definitely reveals its shape and location. And whatever it is, the specialists declared that it is “man-made” because of its organized pattern. Nothing in nature occurs in the perfect pattern of a ship’s internal structure.

This, combined with the pattern of evenly-space metal detector readings on the ship, prove that the structure contained metal at the intersections where the timbers were joined together. The “rocks” which displayed the metal readings may have looked like “rocks”, but we now understand why. The timbers which contained the metal fittings were fossilized. When exposed to the elements, they fragmented which left them looking like weathered rocks. But, the metal content is so concentrated at these precise spots that lab analyses revealed the presence of metal in concentrations and forms which is not found in nature.

q) Another Evidence Which Shouts the Truth

The remains of the ark are resting on a mountainside with a very large section of bedrock limestone extending through its midsection. Radar has confirmed that the limestone is bedrock and not a loose boulder which rolled down the hill- it is a part of the foundation rock.

What explanation is there for the presence of this huge mass of rock extending into the ship? In 1984, Ron and Orhan Baser found what they now are certain is a 120 by 40 foot section of the bottom of the ark (36.6m x 12.2m), a mile or so above its present location.

For a moment, let’s take our thoughts back to the time the water receded and the ark first rested on the earth. At that time, the face of the earth would be extremely muddy. As the water slowly receded and the ark was gently lowered to the earth, it sank into the mud by increments. The bottom of the ship kept extending deeper and deeper into this mud.

The evidence indicates that there was probably a “bilge keel” of some description on the bottom of the ship. A bilge keel is a “fin-like” projection extending downward from the center keel along the bottom, as is seen on sailboats. This “fin” would have provided the ship resistance to sideways tilting, but it would have had another advantage. As the ark slowly sank into the mud, this “fin” would have held the ship in an upright position after it was on the ground.

Then, when God “made a wind to pass over the earth”, which caused the mud to dry out, the ship was held fast in an upright position. Hopefully, we can scan this area with the radar to determine if a bilge keel is present, but for now this is only Ron’s theory. And even it there wasn’t a bilge keel, the ark still would have sunk down in the mud and be held fast.

When the flowing lava carried the ship down the mountainside, it was ripped from this section of the hull which remained firmly embedded in the earth. This left a very large hole in the hull which Dave Fasold determined existed by his use of the MFG, and which Ron later found to exist with the radar scans. However, because Dave didn’t participate in all of the research and field work, he didn’t know about the portion of hull locate up the mountainside, and he interpreted the hole to be a “moonpool”, as he termed it.

r) The Crash into the Limestone Outcropping

When the ark, sliding sideways down the mountainside, hit the large outcropping of limestone, it was literally impaled on the large rock. It extended into the midsection of the ship and was the only thing which held the ark at its present location.

Since the decks had collapsed under the immense weight of the lava, the timbers which held the ribs in their upright position (the deck joists) were broken, and there was nothing to keep the sides from falling outward. As the ark rotated into alignment with the direction of the lava flow (after becoming lodged on the rock), the ribs were thrown outward to some degree, around the midsection.

This is a splaying effect. The end that made the widest swing outward suffered the most outward collapse, and this is what gives the ship its appearance of being wider than it should be.

Keep in mind, however, that the ribs did not fall completely outward, but only splayed enough to give the ship a 138 foot width (40 m) at the widest point, and the original width was 87 feet (26.5m = 50 cubits). The Biblical width of 50 cubits was found to be the width indicated by the internal structures, such as the bulkheads which displayed this width instead of the full width of the splayed hull.

The metal detector scans done in August of 1985 showed how the internal structure near the surface was literally “wrapped around the rock”, similar to a car that is wrapped around a telephone pole.

s) The Ballast- Preflood “Slag”

The “strange material” Ron and Orhan found scattered all over the bottom section of the ark at the site further up the mountainside, proved to be identical to the “strange material” found falling out in massive amounts from the hull on the northern end. This is ballast material and is what first attracted John Baumgardner’s interest after Jim Irwin sent him the specimen Ron had given him from the site above the ark..

It contains a negligible amount of inorganic carbon, as contrasted with the petrified wood, but it contains an incredible amount of manganese dioxide (over 80%) and titanium. One analyses revealed a 74% titanium content. The importance of this specimen is that it displays attributes which indicate that it is slag, or the waste product of some type of metal alloy production.

t) What is Ballast?

Ballast is an absolute necessity for any ship. It is any material of weight which is placed in the hull for purposes of stabilizing the ship, keeping it trim, etc. For more information on this subject, look up shipbuilding. You will find that it is not something that a ship “may or may not” have,- it is a necessity. And a ship the size of the ark would definitely had ballast of some type. The evidence at the ark shows that the builders of the ark used a most ingenious substance for their ballast.

u) Metal Alloy Production

To find a ship wreck on the side of a mountain with a massive amount of heavy substance falling out of it’s hull,- material which is identical to slag-, indicates that probably as the metal objects used in the ship construction were fashioned, the waste product was gathered and placed in the hull. This makes an incredible amount of sense.

A ship of this size would have required a great deal of ballast and this is the perfect source. But what makes us think there was metal production before the flood? Aside from the presence of a great deal of metal at even intervals in the ship, the composition of this ballast material is consistent with metal alloy production.

v) Manganese
Manganese, which is found in extremely high concentrations in these ballast specimens, is used in the production of many alloys:

“More than 95 percent of the manganese produced is used in the form of ferroalloys by the metal industries, chiefly for steel manufacture…. Produced without manganese, steel breaks up when hot-rolled or forged. Steels generally contain less than 1 percent manganese. Manganese steel (12-14 percent manganese) is used for very rugged service; it presents a hard, wear resistant, and self-renewing surface over a wrought unbreakable core. Manganese produced electrolytically is used mostly in steelmaking but also in the production of nonferrous alloys of copper, aluminum, magnesium and the nickel-base alloys and in the production of high purity chemicals. Practically all commercial alloys of aluminum and magnesium contain manganese to improve corrosion resistance and mechanical properties.” (Encyclopaedia Brittanica, 1985 ed., vol.vi”, page 563 under “manganese”.)

On one analysis of the ballast material, John Baumgardner wrote: “tailings of aluminum aloid production”, signed his name and wrote “Los Alamos”. This particular specimen contained 31.44% manganese, 41.95% titanium, no iron, 11.33% silicon, and 7.19% aluminum, among other constituents. This indicates that there was perhaps more than one type of alloy included in these various ballast specimens- and this one was the waste product of aluminum production.

“Aluminum-manganese alloys are popular for cooking utensils, heat exchangers, chemical equipment, storage tanks,… Adding major amounts (about 10 percent) of silicon to commercially pure aluminum yields an alloy with a relatively low melting point…. Because silicon imparts great fluidity to molten metal, this alloy is used in castings. The addition of up to 5 percent magnesium yields an alloy with good tensile strength, weldability, hardness and corrosion resistance in marine atmospheres…. Adding both silicon and magnesium to aluminum produces alloys that are easily formed, machined, welded, and finished, have good resistance to corrosion, and are of medium strength.” (Ibid., vol. 1, page 644, under subject “Aluminum Products and Production”)

The ballast materials, under electron microscope, display the appearance of slag and can therefore be identified with confidence. The exact type of metal production they resulted from cannot be stated with precision. But because of the content of the specimens, which are consistent with present day processes of metal alloy production, it can be stated with confidence that these ARE slag. The large amount of manganese was expended as waste product because, although required in the production of the alloy, only a small percentage remained in the resulting product. The excess was spun off as slag, along with a small amount of the other elements used in the alloy production.

w) Titanium
The discovery of titanium in such a high concentration is of special interest. The process by which titanium could be produced as a metal has only been known since 1936.

“Although the element titanium had been known since its initial discovery in 1791 by William Gregor in England, and its identification in rutile in 1795 and in ilmenite in 1797, it was not until William Justin Kroll, a German refuge in the U.S., invented a magnesium-reduction process in 1936 that the production of metallic titanium became feasible. The process, which Kroll gave to the U.S. Bureau of Mines for development, remains in its original form or modifications thereof, the principle method used today for winning titanium metal from its ores.” (Ibid., vol. 18, page 455, under subject heading “Titanium Products and Production”.)

The advantage of titanium as a metal is its tremendous strength and light weight, which is why today it is used in medical and space age technologies. The quantitative elemental analyses of the rivet-head Ron found in 1991 revealed 8.62% aluminum, 10.38% iron, 1.33% magnesium, and 2.7% sodium, as well as 1.92% titanium. Interestingly, the process for refining titanium involves SODIUM AND MAGNESIUM and sure enough, there they both were!

“The high-purity titanium tetrachloride produced is reduced to metallic titanium by reaction with magnesium or sodium. The Kroll process, which uses magnesium, and modifications that used sodium, as the reducing agents, are batch processes conducted in larger reactors.” (Ibid., p. 456.)

The combined analyses of the fossilized rivet provide more than ample evidence that it was composed of an alloy which contained aluminum, iron and titanium; an alloy which would be extremely strong, lightweight and resistant to the corrosion of the sea waters.

The ballast contains elements which are completely consistent with that of aluminum, titanium and iron alloy productions. The rivet contains elements which are consistent with a very high-tech alloy. For further evidence,“The major alloying elements that are added to titanium are aluminum, vanadium, molybdenum, manganese, iron and chromium.” (Ibid.)

All three analyses of the rivet show iron, aluminum, and manganese, vanadium and chromium. Perhaps one or two of these things could be accepted as “coincidence”, but the entire picture is one that cannot be denied.

x) Hand-Wrought Iron

In June of 1985, when Ron, Dave Fasold and John Baumgardner all surveyed the site with metal detectors, Dave found a specimen which John stated, on camera, displayed the appearance of wrought iron. Dave Fasold wrote about the results of John’s later analyses of the iron specimens in his book, “The Ark of Noah”, p. 255:

“I hurriedly opened the first-class envelope labeled `Los Alamos National Laboratory.’ It contained the semiquantitative analysis of the iron samples were had recovered from the Ark. The stoichiometric results were impressive, with the seven running from 60 percent through 91.84 percent FE2O3. The highest reading was obtained from an angular bracket.”

The angular bracket was the specimen John had identified as having the appearance of wrought iron.

The large iron content of the petrified timbers again verifies the fact that the flowing water which effected the petrification process had travelled over a large amount of iron objects before it arrived at the timber being petrified. Where did this iron come from? Certainly not the surrounding terrain which displayed an only negligible iron content. The evidence indicates that probably various alloys were produced for use in different objects, depending on what properties were required. In fact, the evidence is TOO circumstantial to be interpreted any other way except that it shows conclusive proof of metal alloys used in the ark.

y) The “Manganese Nodules” Theory

One scientist claiming to be a Christian, rejects all the evidences found at the site. Why? Because after he was made aware of it, he continued to raise money to keep searching on Mt. Ararat, a project which other members of his organization state was his favorite. While he hasn’t bothered to present any legitimate reasons refuting most of the evidence, (preferring to state simply that he has investigated it thoroughly 3 times), he DOES present an argument against some of the ballast material.

After all, these specimens are some of the most incredible and important evidences, and to speak out against them requires an alternate explanation. He attacks the analysis of one particular specimen- the one which contains 84.14% manganese dioxide, stating simply that it is nothing but a “manganese nodule”, something that is found all over the ocean floor and is therefore quite common.

Let’s look at that claim. First of all, this site isn’t the ocean floor- it is 6,300 feet above it, and thousands of miles from the Pacific Ocean, which is where these nodules are commonly found. But let’s not take that into consideration. Let’s check into these “nodules” and see what characteristics they have.

“…these manganese nodules contain as much as 2.5 percent copper, 2.0 percent nickel, 0.2 percent cobalt and 35 percent manganese. In some deposits, the content of cobalt and manganese is as high as 2.5 percent and 50 percent respectively. Such concentrations would be considered high-grade ores if found in land,…” (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1985 ed., vol. 13″, page 503, under subject heading “Oceans and Seas”.)

OK, 50% manganese content, we have just read, is considered the highest percentage to be found in these nodules, as well as in land ores. The average is considered to be 35%. Yet, our analyses of these ballast specimens show 87%, 84% and 80%- far above what is found in these nodules. Also, the nodules from the sea floor contain cobalt and nickel, yet these are not present in the ballast specimens.

In addition, there is the size to be considered- the nodules are stated to be an average of about 4 centimeters (slightly less than 2 inches)- yet some of THESE specimens are 10 inches in diameter and more. These factors, combined with the fact that the ballast specimens contain other elements NOT found in the manganese nodules is more than enough evidence to rule out that little theory.

z) “I Don’t See Any Petrified Wood?”

One would think that trained scientists would be able to recognize the fragments found scattered all the way around the ship as pieces of petrified wood- but they don’t. Why? Because they are trained evolutionists- they are taught, and firmly believe, that all petrified wood displays growth rings. But without a belief in the Biblical account, they do not understand or believe that prior to the flood, (which they don’t believe in) conditions were such that growth rings DID NOT OCCUR.

GEN 2-5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD GOD HAD NOT CAUSED IT TO RAIN UPON THE EARTH, and there was not a man to till the ground. 6 But THERE WENT UP A MIST FROM THE EARTH, AND WATERED THE WHOLE FACE OF THE GROUND.

This Scripture has just told us that there was no rain before the flood, which is probably one of the reasons that the world would not believe there was a coming flood. The laws of nature which would be in effect in order to have no rain, but to have this “mist” which “watered the whole face of the earth” would include a very constant temperature. This temperature would not have varied over more than 10 or so degrees. This relatively small variation in temperature would not have been great enough to cause the water in the air to totally condense into raindrops, but would instead produce an effect similar to a greenhouse or a terrarium. Each day, in the cool of the evening, dew would appear on the ground. In the morning, this dew would evaporate as the temperature rose. Day after day, this cycle would continue, keeping a perfect balance of moisture both in the air and on the soil.

aa) What Causes Growth Rings?

Growth rings in trees and other plants are caused by a variation in the water supply to the plant. Annual rings today occur when the temperature drops and the sap in the tree fails to rise. The leaves of the deciduous trees turn color and die, soon dropping off. In the spring, the warmth releases the tree from its state of “hibernation” and the sap begins to flow again. Even though there may be water in the ground, when the temperature drops, the tree does not continue its cycle until it is again spring. Therefore, a ring results when the growth is temporarily halted and begins when spring arrives.

Sometimes, weather conditions, such as a drought, can result in numerous rings in one season. During a severe drought, the tree is deprived of its water supply and growth halts temporarily. Then, a rain comes along and growth resumes during the same season- and here we have 2 rings in one year. There is no way to determine the number of rings which belong to one year, so this method is not reliable in determining a tree’s age.

The petrified wood which contains rings, such as that found in Arizona, is post-flood. Even the evolutionists admit the absence of growth rings in wood from what they call the “Carboniferous” period:

“There was, as we have already said, secondary bark and wood, similar to that of modern trees but lacking the spring and winter rings which correspond to seasonal alternation of moisture and dryness.

This is a further proof that the Carboniferous climate was fairly uniform.” (Larousse Encyclopedia of the Earth, p. 369.)

ab) The “Blind” CANNOT See the Truth

Before the flood, without an annual cessation of water supply and with a constant temperature, the trees grew at a uniform rate continually. No growth rings were formed. But try and tell this to an evolutionist scientist. He simply will not accept it and therefore will never recognize the petrified wood at Noah’s Ark as being wood. So here we have a perfect example of a promise given in the Bible:

ROM 1-28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, GOD GAVE THEM OVER TO A REPROBATE MIND, to do those things which are not convenient;.

When man rejects God and His Truth as HE told it through His Holy Word, God gives him over to Satan, that he will not be able to recognize truth. He will absolutely not accept it because through his rejection of Truth, he is blind.

2TH 2-11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Sadly, this is a fact, so don’t ever expect the world at large to accept the evidence God has so mercifully provided. But for those who DO want the truth, even though they may have been taught lies, their eyes will be opened.

JOH 8-32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

It would be foolish to expect a 4,300 year old wooden ship to remain intact today, unless it was buried in the hot, dry sands of Egypt, like Cheop’s sun boat. It could not be expected to survive at all in the extreme seasons present in the Ararat region, if it were left exposed to the elements all these years. The wood would have long ago rotten and the metal fittings would have oxidized. But protected in the lava flow, its presence was preserved in timbers turned to stone.

Then, the simple outline of its shape was the only clue to its nature in the 1950s. At that time, no evidence was visible or understood. Then,

·  In 1978, the small earthquake dropped the soil from around its sides, revealing on one side, empty holes where rib timbers had fragmented and fallen away after suffering “frost wedging”. On the other side, rib timbers which remained in place in the earth, but which are still fragmented, could be seen by the color difference between them and the surrounding soil.

 

. It’s length is exactly 300 royal Egyptian cubits, the only cubit Moses would have known. The “Hebrew” cubit was of varying lengths at different times, and wouldn’t come into use for many years after Genesis was written.

·  In 1984, metal detectors revealed the presence of a regular pattern of metal readings both along the top and sides of the ark. In 1985 this pattern was plotted out the entire length of the ship, revealing the perfect pattern of a ship.

. In 1986 and 1987, radar scans showed internal structures which were completely consistent with the inside of a ship containing rooms and chambers, as well as 3 decks.

·  Analyses of specimens from the ark show metals which display evidences of being wrought and alloyed. The hull is full of material which is precisely consistent with slag of very advanced metal production- some of whose technology wasn’t known to us until 1936 and 1948.

. And, it is in the mountains of Ararat, in a mountain configuration which matched the crescent-shape of Ron’s experiment of building mountains in a stream and floating a miniature boat past it, of almost 30 years ago.

. It is in the mountains of Ararat,to the Coordinates:

39 26' 26.32" N / 44 14' 04.54" E

 

3- The Following to discover: http://wyattmuseum.com/noahs-ark-the-early-years/2011-697

While regularly reviewing aerial photographs of his country, a Turkish army captain was speechless in front of the photo above. There, on a mountain 20 miles (32 km) south of Mount Ararat, the biblical landing of Noah's Ark, there was a boat-shaped profile about 500 feet long (152 m).

 

And the following :

http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html - by Dan Eden for viewzone

 

 

4- Noah's Ark Is (still) In Turkey

a) Why is this not a BIG story?

I'm often amazed at our lack of knowledge about history. Ordinary people are hungry for this information, yet the organizations responsible to disseminate these facts seem to have an agenda to keep us in the dark. This is true when it comes to our ancient human history and even more so when the subject concerns religion or the Bible.

I won't hold you in suspense with this article: The Ark of Noah has been found. It's real. I'll describe the evidence in some detail and end with the historical and religious implications.

 

b) How it was discovered

In 1959, Turkish army captain Llhan Durupinar discovered an unusual shape while examining aerial photographs of his country. The smooth shape, larger than a football field, stood out from the rough and rocky terrain at an altitude of 6,300 feet near the Turkish border with Iran.

This mountainous land was originally part of the Kingdom of Armenia, a country that is thousands of years old and often considered the "first Christian nation", until the Turks took it over at the beginning of the 20th Century.

Capt. Durupinar was familiar with the biblical accounts of the Ark and its association with Mount Ararat in Turkey, but he was reluctant to jump to any conclusions. The region was very remote, yet it was inhabited with small villages. No previous reports of an object this odd had been made before. So he forwarded the photographic negative to a famous aerial photography expert named Dr. Brandenburger, at Ohio State University.

Brandenburger was responsible for discovering the Cuban missile bases during the Kennedy era from reconnaissance photos, and after carefully studying the photo, he concluded: "I have no doubt at all, that this object is a ship. In my entire career, I have never seen an object like this on a stereo photo."

In 1960 the picture [above] was published in LIFE magazine under the heading of Noahs Ark? That same year a group of Americans accompanied Capt. Durupinar to the site for a day and a half. They were expecting to find artifacts on the surface or something that would be unquestionably related to a ship of some kind. They did some digging in the area but found nothing conclusive and announced to the anxiously waiting world that it appeared to be a natural formation.

Most of the global media turned away from the find and it became a non-story.

In 1977 Ron Wyatt visited the site. Obtaining official permission, Ron and others conducted more thorough research over a period of several years. They used metal detection surveys, subsurface radar scans, and chemical analysis -- real science -- and their findings were startling. The evidence was undeniable. This was the Ark of Noah.

c) the Visual Evidence

The first part of the survey was to examine the object and take its measurements. The shape looked like the hull of a ship. One end was pointed as you would expect from bow [below: D] and the opposite end was blunt like a stern. The distance from bow to stern was 515 feet, or exactly 300 Egyptian cubits. The average width was 50 cubits. These were the exact measurements mentioned in the Bible.

On the starboard side (right) near the stern there were four vertical bulges protruding from the mud [B], at regular intervals, that were determined to be the "ribs" of the hull [see below]. Opposite to these, on the port side, a single rib [A] protrudes from the mud. You can see its curved shape very clearly. Surrounding it are more ribs, still largely buried in the mud, but visible upon close examination.

Remember that this object, if it is the Ark, is extremely old. The wood has been petrified. Organic matter has been replaced by minerals from the earth. Only the shapes and traces of the original wood remain. Perhaps this is why the expedition in 1960 was disappointed. They anticipated finding and retrieving chunks of wood, long since eroded.

                   (Several flat surfaces, of worked wood, spaced regularly)

From the position of the object in the middle of an obvious mudflow, it is obvious that the object slid down more than a mile from its original location. Geologists believe it was originally over 1000 feet higher in the mountain and encased in a shell of hardened mud. They think that an earthquake in 1948 cracked the mud shell and revealed the structure. This is confirmed by stories from the surrounding villagers who tell of its "sudden appearance" around that time.

Biblical accounts of the Ark describe it as having as many as six levels. The assumed shape of the Ark seems consistent with the bulge [C] in the middle of the object. In fact, as we will soon learn, radar scans of the structure suggest that this bulge is the collapsed debris of these levels.

Although most people think of the Ark as being rectangular, that only applies to the top decks. The sleek shape of the hull is necessary to enable the huge ship to remain stable in the water and survive tremendous waves.

d) Ground Penetrating Radar

The human eye needs to see reflected light to recognize an object. To visualize what remains below the earth, scientists use microwaves which can penetrate the ground and bounce back when they hit something solid. This technique is commonly used to locate oil and other minerals. Called Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), the apparatus is made from an antenna that transmits, then listens to receive the "echo" and prints the result on a piece of paper. The delay and strength of this echo tell the geologists how solid and at what depth the objects are under the earth.

The team of geologists didn't scan the entire object. Instead, they marked out lines that crossed the object with yellow tape. Then they dragged the antenna (about the size of a lawnmower) over the lines and watched the output on the paper recorder. When they got a strong "hit" -- meaning there was something solid underneath -- they would record the position on the tape [above]. Later, when they made a map of the object, the tape and the location of the "hits" they realized that there was indeed a structure underneath the mud.

"This data does not represent natural geology. These are man made structures. These reflections are appearing too periodic... too periodic to be random in that type of natural space." -- Ron Wyatt of SIR Imaging team

The radar scans revealed this structure [above] under the mud. The symmetry and logical placement of these objects shows that this is unmistakably a man made structure, most likely the Ark of Noah.

e) Artifacts retrieved from the Ark

Using the GPR, Ron Wyatt discovered an open cavity on the starboard side. He used an improvised drill to make core sample inside this cavity and retrieved several very interesting objects. Below you can see the artifacts which were sent for laboratory analysis. On the left is the bore hole [see below], followed by what turned out to be petrified animal dung, then a petrified antler and lastly a piece of cat hair.

f) Even more amazing artifacts were found

Perhaps the most significant find from the Ark itself is a piece of petrified wood. When this was first found it appeared to be a large beam. But upon closer examination it is actually three pieces of plank that have been laminated together with some kind of organic glue! This is the same technology used in modern plywood. Lamination makes the total strength of the wood much greater than the combined strength of the pieces. This suggests a knowledge of construction far beyond anything we knew existed in the ancient world.

Tests by Galbraith Labs in Knoxville, Tennessee, showed the sample to contain over 0.7% organic carbon, consistent with fossilized wood. The specimen was once living matter.

Examination reveals the glue oozed from the layers. The outside of the wood appears to have been coated with bitumen.

Even more surprising were laboratory analyses which not only revealed that the petrified wood contained carbon (proving it was once wood) but there were iron nails [above right] embedded in the wood!

In Genesis 6:14, God told Noah to "make yourself an ark of gopher wood."

"Gopher wood" is a misreading and scribal error. "Kopher" wood is correct and means wood (any wood) that is covered with Kopher. Kopher is bitumen. In the Genesis text (6:14), the context is clear. The GPR wood used, (a scribal error) is to be covered in KPR. G and K in Hebrew are so similar that inexperienced Hebrew "scholars," such as those translating the King James Version of the Bible, could have been prone to such errors, indeed, they made many such errors.

Acts 7: 45 & Hebrews 4: 8 are classic examples of such scribal errors.

gpr = "g," as in gopher, k pr = "k,"as in kopher Pictured right is a simple visual comparison of the letters.

We like to imagine that humanity evolved in a neat sequence of eras, each named after the technology that was discovered. We have the Stone Age (where man developed arrows and stone tools), the Bronze Age (where metals were combined and heated to make tools and household items) and lastly the Iron Age (where iron and steel objects were made by heating iron ore and adding other material -- like charcoal -- to strengthen it). The Iron Age is usually placed at 1200-1000 BC, yet we have iron nails being used in this extremely old construction.

g) But wait... there's more!

The most surprising find was discovered with sensitive metal detectors. The team located several strong "hits" that, when dug up, revealed large disc shaped rivets. From simple observation of the metal it was possible to see where the rivet had been hammered after being inserted through a hole [below].

If rivets being used in ancient construction doesn't impress you, this surely will.

An analysis of the metal used to make the rivets revealed that they were a combination of iron (8.38%), aluminum (8.35%) and titanium (1.59%). Remember these trace metals have survived petrification and so do not indicate the exact content in the original material. (see Report from Galbraith Labs)

We know the aluminum was incorporated in the metallic mixture because it does not exist in metallic form in nature. This implies an extremely advanced knowledge of metallurgy and engineering. Characteristics of an iron-aluminum alloy have been investigated in The Russian Chemical Bulletin (2005) and reveal that this alloy forms a thin film of aluminum oxide which protects the material from rust and corrosion. The addition of titanium would provide added strength. This seems to have worked. The rivets have survived from antiquity!

h) The surrounding area has more surprises

Several miles from the location of the Ark, huge stones were discovered, some standing upright while others lying on the ground. These stones, weighing many tons, have holes carved in them. Scientists have determined that they were anchors and the holes would have been their attachment to a ship with hemp rope.

Often these stones will have crosses carved in them, from centuries ago when pilgrims made the journey to visit the Ark. Yes, the Ark was well known in the Middle Ages and even before. And its location was recorded in many historical documents.

"And the Ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat. And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen." -- Genesis 8:4-5

The Gilgamesh Epic (650 BC) gives Mt. Nisir as the landing place of the Ark. The local name for the town where the Ark was found is Nasar.

The annals of Ashurnasurpal II of Assyria (833-859 BC) places it south of the Zab river (correct).

Theophilus of Antioch (115-185 AD) said the Ark could be seen in his day in the Arabian mountains. Later Church Fathers also mention the Ark as late as the mid 7th century.

In the 13th century, Willam, a traveler, stated for the first time that Mt. Masis was the Ark location (present-day Mt. Ararat).

Ptolemy's Geographia (1548) mentions the mountains of Armenia as the place of landing. So does the traveler Nicolas de Nicolay (1558).

Pilgrims to the site would gather bits and pieces of the petrified wood which would be used as charms to ward off evil. When they encountered the anchors, they had no doubt about their association with the Ark. They often carves one big cross to represent Noah and smaller crosses representing his family.

The huge anchors would have been suspended from the keel of the ship. This was a common practice among ancient mariners to stabilze a heavy ship and ensure that the bow is always facing the on-coming waves. A "top heavy" ship, such as the Ark, could easily be capsized by a wave approaching from the side. This is yet further proof that Noah's Ark was a reality and that it has indeed been found in Turkey.

Note from D.C. We personally believe that the anchors were not suspended underwater because they could then have clung to the seabed. On the other hand positioned on the sides of the arch, just under the waterline, the stone anchors served as stabilizer against the roll of the ark and could be easily unhooked by Noah when he saw the waters begin to descend, this to allow a better stability of the arch on its central seat when it rested on the ground. This seems to be proven by the distribution of anchors far and wide around the arch site. (See drawings and calculation above)

i) After Noah's Ark landed

When Dr. Brandenburger originally examined and enlarged the photographs of the "strange object" in Turkey, he also saw hundreds of ancient foundations in the region, suggesting to him that this might have been the first town established after the flood, as described in the Bible.

Now their settlement extended from Mesha as you go toward Sephar, the hill country of the east. -- Genesis 10:30

Archaeological teams have found many ruins and ancient graves. Many human ribs have been excavated and sent to laboratories for dating. In the midst of this alleged "first city" of Noah, there is an unusual and prominent structure, about 10 feet in diameter, that many believe to be the altar on which Noah made his first sacrifice.

Then Noah built an altar to the Lord, and took of every clean animal and of every clean bird, and offered burnt offerings on the altar. And the Lord smelled a soothing aroma. Then the Lord said in His heart, "I will never again curse the ground for man's sake, although the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; nor will I again destroy every living thing as I have done. While the earth remains, Seedtime and harvest, Cold and heat, Winter and summer, And day and night Shall not cease. -- Genesis 8:20/22

Again, it surprised me when I research a story like this and find substantial evidence that something extremely important has been found, yet it has been ignored by historians and the media. Perhaps it is because the advanced technology discovered in the Ark suggests that Sumerian legends, the Epic of Gilamesh, and other ancient writing might actually be correct when they speak of an extraterrestrial connection. The plural of god -- Elohim -- is used even in Genesis. Who were these "gods" and how did they walk the Earth and interact with humans of the era...

Or perhaps this discovery should be seen as a good reason to accept the Bible at its word.

We all need to look deeper into our past to learn what sort of beings we really are, where we are coming from and where we are going.

What do you think of this?

I'd really like to hear from you.

God Bless! If you liked the content of this story please support viewzone so we can continue to spread the (much needed) truth.

 

 

j) Some photos from the video:

http://wyattmuseum.com/analysis-reveals-metal-content-in-specimen-taken-from-ark-site-in-turkey/2016-11865

 

 

 

5- Explaining the Flood

See a plausible scenario of the Flood in Chapter 56b

 

At the time of the Flood of Noah (likewise during the Great Tribulation)

A 1st huge meteorite impacts Earth and breaks the water belt surrounding the Earth (Genesis 1-6/7), or a meteor rain. In a single day, on the 17th of the 2nd month, the shield of water above the atmosphere is destroyed and a huge mass of water falls violently on the Earth; likewise, the Earth's crust breaks under the shock of the meteorite, releasing ALL internal water sources of the Earth. The water shield finishes raining for 40 days. 150 days later, a second huge meteorite (or a meteor rain) impact the Earth covered by water and the Ark on the water not taking damage while the earth's crust breaks under the shock of the Meteorite and high mountain ranges appear on the earth in minutes.

These 2 huge meteorites (or these 2 meteor rain) were able to follow the passage of Planète 7X, 5 months apart (5 x 30 = 150 days).

 

(See P-7X 4 Noah Flood, Gill P. Broussard's Planet-7X Free Book - Chapter 14 and Appendix 2)

If the ark was poles apart from the impact of the meteorite, the blast from that impact could be felt like a strong wind around the earth and heard in the ark. God is in perfect control of all things ...

 

 

Genesis 7-11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep were gushed out, and the windows of heaven were opened. 12 The rain fell on the earth forty days and forty nights.

Genesis 7-24 The waters were heavy on the earth for a hundred and fifty days. 8-1 God remembered Noah, and all the animals and all the cattle that were with him in the ark; and God sent a wind on the earth, and the waters were calmed. 2 The fountains of the bottomless pit and the locks of heaven were shut, and the rain did not fall from the sky. 3 The waters withdrew from the earth, departing and departing, and the waters dwindled after a hundred and fifty days.

 

Here is what the Bible says about this protective layer of water:

Genesis 1-6 God said: Let there be a place between the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters. 7 And God made the expanse, and separated the waters that are under the expanse from the waters that are above the expanse. And so it was. 8 God called the expanse heaven. So there was evening, and there was morning: it was the second day.

Before the flood, the protective cap made of water which surrounded the earth was not destroyed even after the crossing of a large meteorite if it had a frontal direction perpendicular to the center of the earth. On the other hand, in the event of a strongly tangential impact, the heating due to friction in the atmosphere could have caused this protective layer of water to collapse. If the impact is tangential and burns this layer over a great length... The flood then occurs.

This protective layer of water allowed the same climate across the entire earth both at the North and South poles and at the equator, which is evidenced by the fossils of giant ferns found all over the earth and having lived at the same time.

Here is the simulation of a ball passing through an envelope of water suspended above a plate filled with water:

 

 

 

An excellent scientific video on Noah's Flood: GEOPHYSICS - Plate Tectonics

In-depth explanation of the causes of Noah's flood - Dr. Kurt Wise

(with comments translated into several languages, including Spanish, French…)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2ANUKSF2BE&list=PLRyG7447g5Sr6lBD7BidISdNZqfYvsgtA&index=2

 

 

6- The mystery of the Day of the Rapture in connection with the Flood

 

God controls all things and He is very very very accurate (They are 3 in 1). If it took 100 years to build the ark, it only took 7 days to fill the ark with all the countless animals. It must have been a grand parade, the greatest of all antediluvian times.

Noah and his family entered the ark 7 days before the big day, this seventeenth day of the second month.

So they entered the ark on the tenth day of the second month.

After that day, the tenth day of the second month, Noah and his family no longer came out of the ark. They have come to their means of salvation and have not come out of it.

And the Flood came 7 days later, and engulfed everything.

 

Genesis 7-1 And the LORD said to Noah, Enter the ark, you and all your house; for I have seen you right in front of me among this generation. 2 And thou shalt take unto thee seven pairs of all pure animals, the male and his female; a pair of animals that are not pure, the male and his female; 3 Seven couples also of the birds of the sky, male and female, to keep their seed alive on the face of all the earth.4 For seven more days, and I will rain on the earth forty days and forty nights, and Exterminate from the face of the earth all the beings that I have made. 5 And Noah did all that the LORD commanded him. 6 Noah was six hundred years old, when the flood of waters was on the earth. 7 And Noah went into the ark with his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives, to escape the waters of the flood. 8 Of the pure animals and the animals that are not pure, the birds and all that moves on the earth, 9 he entered the ark near Noah, two by two, a male and a female, as God had commanded Noah. 10 Seven days later the waters of the flood were on the earth. 11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, in that day all the fountains of the great deep were gushed out, and the windows of heaven were opened. 12 The rain fell on the earth forty days and forty nights.

 

CHRIST Our Ark, Our only means of salvation given by GOD is today at the door, and He is still waiting for someone to ask: "Save me". He can save anyone, He has paid the price of the redemption of all but can only save those who ask Him. Many, locked in their pride, not having the love of the truth to be saved, will not ask Him, they will condemn themselves.

 

 

If the chronometer of God that starts the End Times

was triggered at the time of the Great Sign in Heaven,

Great Sign accomplished on the 23/9/2017 between 22 and 23h or

Great Symmetrical Sign dated 26/9/2017 at 10am (60h + late)

From Great Symmetrical Sign on 26/9/2017 at 10am;

26/9/2017 + 12 x 60 days (720 days)

=> Monday September 16, 2019

 

If the rapture takes place on September 16 or 17, 2019

The next 7 days will be 7 days of amazement

and questioning the whole world.

And on September 23 or 24, 2019,

the Great Tribulation of 7 times will begin,

and a very little flock will survive (See Chap 26). 

 

 

Let's consider carefully the 24th day of the 9th month of Prophet Haggai

Haggai 2-10 On the twenty-fourth day of the ninth month, the second year of Darius, the word of Jehovah was revealed by Haggai the prophet, saying, 11 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, Sacrifice unto the priests a question about the law: 12 If any one wears the garment of the consecrated flesh in the garment, and touches with his garment some bread, some food, some wine, some oil, or some food, these will things be sanctified? The priests answered, No! 13 And Haggai said, If any man soiled by the touch of a corpse touch all these things, shall they be unclean? The priests answered, they will be unclean. 14 Then answered Haggai, and said, this is the people, such is this nation before me, saith the LORD, such are all the works of their hands; What they offer me there is stained.

15 Therefore consider carefully what has happened to this day, before they had stoned to the temple of the Lord! 16 So when you came to a heap of twenty measures, there were only ten; When one came to the tank to draw fifty measures, there were only twenty. 17 I have smitten you with rust and nipple, and with hail; I hit all the work of your hands. Yet you did not return to me, says the Lord.

18 Consider carefully what has happened to this day, until the twenty-fourth day of the ninth month, from the day that the temple of the LORD was founded, consider it carefully!

 

Beginning: The True Temple of God (The Body of Christ: The Church) was founded at the Cross on March 15, 29

And will be built by Jesus and most certainly completed on September 16/17, 2019, then The Kingdom of God and the Authority of His Christ will be proclaimed in Heaven on September 24, 2019:

End: September 24, 2019 (According to the Calendar of Nations, because according to the Jewish Calendar - 9th = Kislev = Nov-Dec?).

Here God speaks prophetically to all nations, for in all the families of the earth there will be children of God.

Note that here Haggai specifies: the 24th of the 9th month and not the 24th of Kislev.

Nehemiah said that the wall ended on Elul 25, which is this year on Wednesday, September 25, 2019. (Chapter 70)

This year the 24th of the 9th month corresponds to the 24th of Elul 5779 and the Tuesday 24th of September 2019.

 

Would Haggai have prophesied about the True Temple of God built by Jesus?

Yes, Haggai will prophesy: ​​2-9 The glory of this last house will be greater than that of the first, saith the Lord of hosts; And it is in this place that I will give peace, says the Lord of hosts.

When: 2-6 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, Yet a little while, and I will shake the heavens and the earth, the sea and the dry; 7 I will shake all the nations; The treasures of all nations will come, and I will fill this house with glory, says the Lord of hosts.

All nations will contribute to the glory of the last Temple, home of the Messiah Jesus during the Millennium. (see Annex 5). But the successive temples built in Jerusalem by men have never equaled in beauty and glory those of the first temple built by Solomon.

But above all, the Temple of God which is not made of human hands and in which God lives by His Spirit, the whole of the hearts of man regenerated thanks to the unique work of salvation accomplished by the Messiah Jesus ( men taken from all nations, stones become precious by the size of the Holy Spirit),

This Temple is the Masterpiece of God.

For we are his work (His Masterpiece), having been created in Jesus Christ for good works ... In Jesus Christ the whole edifice, well-coordinated, rises to be a holy temple in the Lord. 22 In him you are also edified to be a dwelling of God in the Spirit. Ephesians 2-10 & 20/21

Haggai 2-19 Was there still seed in the granaries? Even the vine, the fig tree, the pomegranate tree, and the olive tree yielded nothing. But from that day (September 24) I will pour out my blessing.

Satan's destructive reign, of the man's enemy, since man has submitted to his domination.

Blessing from this day (24/09) for the True Temple: The Marriage of the Lamb

See Revelation 12-10 And I heard a loud voice in heaven saying, Now is the salvation, and the power, and the kingdom of our God, and the authority of his Christ; for the accuser of our brethren, who accused them before our God day and night, was hastened. 11 They overcame him because of the blood of the Lamb, and because of the word of their testimony, and they did not love their life until they feared death. 12 Wherefore rejoice ye heavens, and ye that dwell in heaven. Woe to the earth and the sea! for the devil has come down to you, angry, knowing that he has little time.

 

God will now emphasize a second time why this date of 24/09 is important,

Haggai 2-20 And the word of Jehovah came to Haggai for the second time on the twenty-fourth day of the month, saying, 21 Speak to Zerubbabel, governor of Judah, and say, I will shake the heavens and the earth;

September 24, 2019: Proclamation of The Reign of Our God, and The Authority of His Christ

If the angels enter Heaven on 16 or 17/09/2019 with CHRIST (Jesus + His Saints), they fight and drive out Satan and the demons and rush them to the earth in final on 24/09/2019.

The heavens are shaken first, then the earth will be shaken.

See Revelation 12-7 And there was war in heaven. Michael and his angels fought against the dragon. And the dragon and his angels fought, 8 but they were not strongest, and their place was no longer found in heaven. 9 And the great dragon, the old serpent, called the devil, and Satan, the seducer of all the earth, was thrown down, and he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.

Haggai 2-22 I will overthrow the throne of the kingdoms; I will destroy the strength of the kingdoms of the nations; I will overthrow the chariots and those that ride them; The horses and their riders will be slaughtered, one by the sword of the other.

The worldwide ephemeral reign of the Anti-Christ on earth that will begin on 24/09/2019 (following the departure of the One who prevented it to this day) will be destroyed by the Servant of God, the Messiah Jesus, 7 time later.

Haggai 2-23 And it shall come to pass in that day, saith Jehovah of hosts, Zorubbabel the son of Shealtiel, O my servant, saith Jehovah, and I will keep you as a seal; For I have chosen you, says the LORD of hosts.

Zorubbabel will be one of the ancestors of Jesus. Matthew 1-12, Luke 3-27

September 24, 2019: Welcome to the Heavens of CHRIST (formed of Jesus the Head and the Church His Body), the Hero of God, the Lord of all the universe, who will rule over the nations for a thousand years on earth .

Divine Union sealed with a ring on the finger of God.

 

 

Would God have clearly indicated

The Date of His Celestial Union

in His Word?

 

Supplement written on the 09/20/2019:

The rapture of the Saints can also take place on the 24th and 25th of the month of Elul 5779, which are also the 24th and 25th of September 2019. (see Nehemiah 6-15 in Chapter 70) For some it will still be the 24th when the Asians will be moved on September 25th.

The text can also be understood as:

Haggai 2-19 Was there still seed in the granaries? Even the vine, the fig tree, the pomegranate tree, and the olive tree yielded nothing. But from that day (September 24) I will pour out my blessing.

Haggai 2-20 And the word of Jehovah came to Haggai for the second time on the twenty-fourth day of the month, saying, 21 Speak to Zerubbabel, governor of Judah, and say, I will shake the heavens and the earth;

After the Rapture of the Saints on September 24, 2019, there will be war in the sky following the entry of the Angels of God, then the earth will be shaken by the rush of all the demons on the earth.

Verses 22 and 23 prophesied by Haggai speak of the coming in glory of Jesus.

 

Supplement N ° 2 written on 06/12/2020:

The 24th day of the 9th month of the Prophet Haggai is an important date:

  • Prophet's proclamation (verses 10, 18, 20)
  • Fulfillment for the Anointed Zorobabel (verse 23):
  • "I will take you, My Servant and I will keep you like a seal, because I have chosen You."

The 24th day of the 9th month for the Great Sign is an important date:

  • It starts on 9/23/2017 at 6 p.m. in Jerusalem and ends on 9/24/2017 at 6 a.m.
  • The moon passes under the feet of the Virgo Constellation on 09/23/2017 at 10 p.m.,

But this is more obvious from the start of 09/24/2017.

If The 24th day of the 9th month for God is an important date:

  • It can last 1000 days and start on 09/24/2017 and end on 06/19/2020
  • It can mark the date of the Rapture of Saints on 06/19/2020

 

Supplement N ° 3 written on 06/23/2020:

The 24th day of the 9th month of the Prophet Haggai is an important date cited 5 times:

  • Prophet's proclamation (verses 10, 18, 19, 20, 23)

The 24th day of the 9th month for the Great Sign is an important date:

  • It starts on 9/23/2017 at 6 p.m. in Jerusalem and ends by perfect symetry on 9/24/2017 at 6 a.m.

If The 24th day of the 9th month for God is an important date:

  • It can last 1000 + 5 days and starts on 09/26/2017 and ends on 06/26/2020

It can mark the date of the Rapture of Saints on 06/26/2020

______________________

 

To announce the prophetic coming of His Messiah reigning over the nations for the sole glory of God,

God needed a prophet whom He had to fill with joy from birth.

Definition of "Chaggay" = Haggai: "in celebration", "born on a holiday", "Happy"

Comes from Chag: Feast, feast, party gathering, pilgrimage

 

Haggai 2-7 And I will shake all nations. And the object of the desire of all nations shall come, and I will fill this house with glory, saith the LORD of hosts. (J. Darby)

7 And I will shake all nations, and the desire of all nations will come and I will fill this house with glory, know the LORD of hosts. (King James version)

St. Jerome, translates verse 7:                             "The Desired of all nations will come ..." (Vulgate, Luther: consolation ...)

Jesus will be the One in whom God will put all His Affection, His Pleasure, His Joy.

Of all nations, the last prayer of the Bible will rise to Heaven from

the Church waiting for her Desired One:

 

"Come Lord Jesus"

 

Haggai 2-6 For thus saith the LORD of hosts, Once again, which shall be in a short time, I will shake the heavens and the earth, the sea, and the dry;

Prophecy of 21/07 for 1 confirmation on 24/09.

Gathering of the redeemed already in the heavens and the earth, and those engulfed in the seas or buried in the earth.

Haggai 2-7 And I will shake all nations; and the desires (all the desires - Hebrew Interlinear) of all nations will come, and I will fill this house with glory, said the LORD of hosts. (D. Martin)

 

According to these two versions, if plural there is, then Our Lord GOD expresses His Desire to see all His Redeemed Elects fill His Temple, In His Son Jesus Christ. His Tresures are His Children.

Our Lord GOD tells us:

 

"Yes, I'm coming soon"